The ticker regime, explained and tested
Every stock gets its own Bull, Recovery, Bear or Crisis label. It tells you how rough the next month is likely to be, not which way the stock will go.
- 72% vs 28%
- Next-month volatilityCrisis vs Bull stocks
- 39% vs 13%
- Odds of a 10% dropwithin a month, Crisis vs Bull
- +1.1% vs +0.6%
- Next-month returnBear vs Bull: no direction call
- 17–22%
- Option premiumof implied vol, every state
Summary
The ticker regime is computed for each of the 3,056 liquid U.S. stocks we tested, every night, from the stock's own price path. It reuses the four states of the Undercurrent, our market model, so a stock's label answers “which market state does this stock's chart look like?”
From 1997 to 2026 it sorted stocks by risk, steadily: next-month volatility of 28%–30% in Bull and Bear, 43% in Recovery and 72% in Crisis (2010–2022). It did not sort them by direction. As a buy-or-sell rule it trailed a plain 200-day average on the same stocks.
So read it as a risk label for the name in front of you, alongside the market regime for the tape as a whole.
How it is computed
Every night, for every stock. Nothing is fitted per stock.
- 18 features from the stock's daily prices, plus two market ETFs (HYG for credit, TLT for Treasuries): drawdowns, trend, returns, volatility and cross-asset spreads.
- Scaling. Each feature becomes
z = (value − median) / IQR, using the medians and interquartile ranges of the market model's training data. - Distance. For each of the four states, add up
weight × |z − centroid|over the 18 features. The centroids are the market model's state averages; the weights are Fisher ratios, how well each feature separates the states. - Scores. A softmax turns the four distances into scores out of 100:
score = exp(−distance / 50), normalised. These are the bull, recovery, bear and crisis scores on the screener. - Pick. Crisis wins when it has the top score; otherwise Bear, then Recovery, then Bull.
- Stickiness. The current label stays unless another state beats its score by more than 15 points, so labels do not flicker day to day. Days in the label are counted as “days in regime”.
The constants were taken from the market model trained in April 2026 and are frozen: retraining the market model does not move them.
The 18 features and their weights
Heaviest first. The top six (drawdown from the 60-day high, drawdown from the 1-year high, distance from the 200-day average…) are about where price sits against its recent highs and trend.
| Feature | Group | Weight | Median | IQR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Drawdown from the 60-day highdd60 | Drawdown | 6.1 | −0.0138 | 0.0395 |
Drawdown from the 1-year highdd252 | Drawdown | 5.0 | −0.0200 | 0.0551 |
Distance from the 200-day averagedist200 | Trend | 4.7 | 0.1053 | 0.1304 |
Drawdown from the 20-day highdd20 | Drawdown | 4.7 | −0.0124 | 0.0386 |
5-day returnret5 | Momentum | 4.5 | 0.0040 | 0.0223 |
Distance from the 20-day averagetrend20 | Trend | 3.8 | 0.0079 | 0.0251 |
20-day volatilityvol20 | Volatility | 3.8 | 0.0623 | 0.0473 |
14-day average true range / priceatr_pct | Volatility | 3.2 | 0.0544 | 0.0428 |
5-day volatilityvol5 | Volatility | 2.6 | 0.0849 | 0.0798 |
Spread of the 9, 21 and 50-day EMAsema_spread | Trend | 2.5 | 0.0268 | 0.0245 |
5-day HYG return (market credit)credit_rec | Cross-asset | 2.5 | 0.0010 | 0.0209 |
20-day returnret20 | Momentum | 2.4 | 0.0148 | 0.0445 |
20-day TLT return minus the stock'sflight | Cross-asset | 2.4 | −0.0134 | 0.0695 |
5-day TLT return minus HYG's (market)credit_stress | Cross-asset | 2.0 | −0.0006 | 0.0269 |
20-day average vs 50-day averagesma_cross | Trend | 2.0 | 0.0097 | 0.0233 |
3-day returnret3 | Momentum | 1.8 | 0.0026 | 0.0175 |
5-day volatility × 5-day returnvol_return_5d | Volatility | 1.5 | 0.0001 | 0.0012 |
(10-day HYG return minus the stock's) × 20-day volatilitycredit_vol | Cross-asset | 0.4 | 0.0000 | 0.0009 |
Swipe the table for every column.
Volatilities are annualised and multiplied by 0.5 in the code. Two features (HYG's 5-day return, and TLT minus HYG) use only market ETFs, so they are the same for every stock on a given day.
The four centroids
Where each state sits, in scaled units (0 = the market's median; 1 = one interquartile range).
| Feature | Bull | Recovery | Bear | Crisis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drawdown from the 60-day high | 0.19 | −1.30 | −0.93 | −4.16 |
| Drawdown from the 1-year high | 0.18 | −1.31 | −0.75 | −3.02 |
| Distance from the 200-day average | 0.32 | −0.92 | −0.54 | −2.58 |
| Drawdown from the 20-day high | 0.14 | −0.68 | −1.30 | −5.13 |
| 5-day return | 0.17 | 0.70 | −1.07 | −2.99 |
| Distance from the 20-day average | 0.20 | 0.25 | −1.11 | −3.37 |
| 20-day volatility | −0.24 | 1.37 | 0.33 | 3.59 |
| 14-day average true range / price | −0.26 | 1.11 | 0.38 | 4.36 |
| 5-day volatility | −0.27 | 1.03 | 0.58 | 4.13 |
| Spread of the 9, 21 and 50-day EMAs | 0.10 | 0.38 | −0.18 | 2.96 |
| 5-day HYG return (market credit) | 0.10 | 0.72 | −0.82 | −3.66 |
| 20-day return | 0.24 | −0.11 | −0.83 | −3.02 |
| 20-day TLT return minus the stock's | −0.23 | 0.08 | 0.65 | 2.72 |
| 5-day TLT return minus HYG's (market) | −0.11 | −0.41 | 0.60 | 2.02 |
| 20-day average vs 50-day average | 0.17 | −0.88 | −0.23 | −2.23 |
| 3-day return | 0.13 | 0.58 | −0.88 | −2.31 |
| 5-day volatility × 5-day return | 0.18 | 1.75 | −1.74 | −18.00 |
| (10-day HYG return minus the stock's) × 20-day volatility | 0.16 | 0.25 | −0.82 | −5.67 |
Swipe the table for every column.
- Bull: above its 200-day average, positive 20-day return, shallow drawdowns, volatility below normal.
- Recovery: still deep below its 60-day and 1-year highs, but bouncing hard (5-day return up, volatility high).
- Bear: falling over 5 and 20 days, drawdowns building, Treasuries outpacing the stock and credit stress up; volatility only slightly above normal.
- Crisis: far out on every axis: drawdowns 3 to 5 ranges deep, volatility about 4 ranges above normal.
What each state is followed by
All 3,056 stocks, 2010–2022. The other periods agree.
Next-month volatility
Odds of falling more than 10% at some point in the next month
| State | Next-month return | Up | Next-month vol | Last month's vol | Stock-days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bull | +0.6% | 54% | 28% | 26% | 1.74M |
| Recovery | +1.2% | 53% | 43% | 44% | 2.69M |
| Bear | +1.1% | 56% | 30% | 27% | 1.55M |
| Crisis | +3.1% | 55% | 72% | 79% | 0.86M |
| Above the 200-day average | +1.0% | 54% | 35% | 34% | 3.97M |
| Below the 200-day average | +1.6% | 54% | 47% | 48% | 2.87M |
Swipe the table for every column.
Risk sorts cleanly: Crisis stocks moved 2.6 times as much as Bull stocks. Most of that is volatility persisting, since each state's next-month volatility is close to its last month's. Direction does not sort: about 54% of Bull stocks and 56% of Bear stocks were up a month later. Crisis has the highest average but by far the widest spread, and survivorship flatters it.
As a buy-or-sell rule
Hold each stock when the rule says so, cash otherwise. Equal weight across stocks, 1997–2026.
| Rule | Return / yr | Sharpe | Worst drawdown | Profit factor | Switches / yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buy and hold | 22.4% | 1.00 | −50.2% | – | 0 |
| White arrow | 6.3% | 0.45 | −32.0% | 1.41 | 10.3 |
| Above the 200-day average | 4.4% | 0.28 | −29.4% | 1.87 | 8.6 |
| Stock regime (hold Bull/Recovery) | 2.3% | 0.06 | −44.2% | 1.34 | 13.9 |
Swipe the table for every column.
Close to close, each signal earning the next day, cash at the 13-week T-bill, 5 bps per switch. Profit factor is per round trip, 2010–2022, on the public track record's rules.
Every timing rule trails buy-and-hold here, partly because the test uses today's surviving stocks: names that fell and never came back are missing, which rewards holding through drops. Between the timing rules the comparison is fairer, and the ticker regime is the weakest: it holds stocks 65% of the time yet earns less than the 200-day average. It also stays in volatile Recovery names and steps out of calm Bear ones.
What it says about option prices
At-the-money implied volatility of the nearest weekly expiry against the volatility that followed, 502 stocks, Nov 2024 - Nov 2026.
| State | Implied vol | Realized to expiry | Premium | Premium / implied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bull | 41.0% | 33.5% | 7.4 pts | 18% |
| Recovery | 57.3% | 47.2% | 10.0 pts | 17% |
| Bear | 37.6% | 29.5% | 8.1 pts | 22% |
| Crisis | 77.3% | 63.9% | 13.5 pts | 17% |
Swipe the table for every column.
Option prices already know the state. Implied volatility rises from about 38% in Bear to 77% in Crisis. The premium over the volatility that followed accounts for 17–22% of implied volatility in every state. The label tells you how much volatility you are buying or selling, not that options are cheap or rich.
How to use it
What the data supports. Not advice for any account.
- Size by state. A Crisis or Recovery stock has moved 2.6 and 1.5 times as much as a Bull stock. Holding equal risk rather than equal dollars means smaller positions there. The default leverage map sizes Recovery like Bull (3x); the data says Recovery is the second-riskiest state.
- Do not read Bear as sell. Bear stocks were about as calm as Bull stocks and returned as much the next month. Bear describes a drifting-down chart, not a coming drop.
- Expect the drawdowns. About 39% of Crisis stocks fell more than 10% at some point in the next month, against 13% of Bull stocks. Stops and position sizes should leave room for that.
- Options: the state sets the volatility you trade. Selling premium on a Crisis stock collects about 1.8 times the points of a Bull stock, against proportionally larger moves. Defined-risk structures (spreads rather than naked options) cap the loss where moves are largest. Buying options is cheapest on Bull and Bear names because those names move less, not because the options are mispriced.
- Pair it with the market regime. The market regime reads the tape as a whole; the ticker regime reads one name. A Crisis stock in a calm market is a stock-specific story.
Limitations
- Survivorship. Today's liquid stocks only. Failed companies are missing, which flatters long trades and buy-and-hold and penalises exit rules.
- Market scaling on single stocks. The medians, ranges and centroids come from market data. Stocks are more volatile than the index, so they sit in Recovery and Crisis far more often than the market does.
- Overlapping windows. Next-month statistics overlap day to day; they describe, they do not prove.
- Two years of option data, nightly weekly-expiry IV, which includes earnings premium.
- Not advice. A research note on a public model.
How we tested it
3,056 stocks, 1997–2026, the public track record's universe and rules.
- Universe. Liquid U.S. common stocks as on the public track record: price of $5 or more, $1M or more traded a day, no ETFs, funds, REITs, BDCs, preferreds or crypto.
- Trades. The track record's round-trip engine: enter at the next open after the rule turns on, exit at the next open after it turns off, a 250-bar warm-up, returns capped at −95% and +500%.
- Portfolios. Close to close, equal weight, cash at the 13-week T-bill (a flat 3.6% before July 2006), 5 bps per switch; daily moves beyond −90% or +300% treated as bad prints.
- States. Next 21 sessions after each stock-day: return, realized volatility, and whether the stock fell more than 10% below that day's close.
- Options. Nightly at-the-money call implied volatility of the nearest weekly expiry, against realized volatility from that day to expiry.
Questions
What it is, Bear, what it is good for, trading it, advice.
What is the ticker regime?
A label each stock gets every night: Bull, Recovery, Bear or Crisis. It compares 18 features of the stock's own price path (plus two credit ETFs) with the four states of the Undercurrent, the market model, and picks the closest.
Does a Bear label mean the stock will fall?
No. In the test, Bear stocks returned +1.1% over the next month on average, against +0.6% for Bull. The label describes how a stock is moving, and its risk; it does not forecast direction.
What is it good for?
Gauging risk. Crisis stocks moved about 2.6 times as much as Bull stocks the following month and fell more than 10% at some point 39% of the time.
Should I trade in and out on it?
The data says no. As a hold-or-cash rule it trailed a plain 200-day average and the white arrow on the same stocks, and it switched more often (14 times a year per stock).
Is this investment advice?
No. It is a research note on a public model, with stated assumptions. Past results do not guarantee future ones.