$170.59+0.48% today
- 5Y
- +211.97%
- $10K became
- $31,197
SELLBEAR
XOM vs COP
Total return with dividends reinvested · 5Y
XOM
COP
$142.28+1.59% today
- 5Y
- +133.40%
- $10K became
- $23,340
Return and risk 5Y
| Ticker | $10K became | Total | Per year | Volatility | Worst drop | Off high now | Best year | Worst year | Years up | Corr. with XOM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | $31,197 | +211.97% | +25.59% | 26.7% | -20.51% | -8.90% | +80.49% 2022 | -2.88% 2023 | 75% | — |
| COP | $23,340 | +133.40% | +18.50% | 32.7% | -36.29% | -7.63% | +68.32% 2022 | -13.30% 2024 | 50% | 0.83 |
XOM
- $10K became
- $31,197
- Total
- +211.97%
- Per year
- +25.59%
- Volatility
- 26.7%
- Worst drop
- -20.51%
- Off high now
- -8.90%
- Best year
- +80.49% 2022
- Worst year
- -2.88% 2023
COP
- $10K became
- $23,340
- Total
- +133.40%
- Per year
- +18.50%
- Volatility
- 32.7%
- Worst drop
- -36.29%
- Off high now
- -7.63%
- Best year
- +68.32% 2022
- Worst year
- -13.30% 2024
Per year: compound annual growth rate, needs a year of history. Volatility: yearly spread of daily returns. Best and worst years: full calendar years only.
Drawdown from peak 5Y
0%-20%-40%
2021-112026-11
Correlation of daily returns
XOMCOPXOM1.000.83COP0.831.00
1 moves together, 0 unrelated, negative moves opposite. Lower means more diversification.
Trailing returns up to 5 years
| Ticker | 1Y | 2Y | 3Y | 5Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | — | — | — | — |
| COP | — | — | — | — |
Calendar-year returns best each year in bold
| Year | XOM | COP |
|---|---|---|
| No full years in this range yet. | ||
More comparisons
About this comparison
Summary, desk note and 6 common questions.
Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) vs ConocoPhillips (COP) total return over 5Y: XOM +211.97%, COP +133.40%. Regime XOM BEAR. As of Nov 13, 2026. Research only.
Exxon Mobil (XOM) closed at $183.2 on 2026‑10‑23, up 2.79% on the day, while ConocoPhillips (COP) finished at $150.8, up 3.55% the same session. Over the past five years the total‑return overlay—dividends and splits included—has lifted XOM by +239.8% versus a +136.6% gain for COP, underscoring the integrated giant’s stronger price appreciation. Fundamentally, XOM trades at a forward P/E of 16.84 and offers a 2.25% dividend yield, with ROE of 12.68% and a balanced value‑growth profile (Value 25, Growth 32). COP’s forward P/E of 16.34 is slightly tighter, its dividend yield sits at 2.23%, and ROE reaches 14.32% supported by a higher quality score (32.88) and a dividend‑compounder archetype. Both stocks carry a BUY directional signal. XOM is classified as a “Balanced” archetype, while COP is tagged as a “Dividend Compounder (blended).” Open each stock’s page or methodology for full overlay detail.
What does the XOM vs COP overlay show?
LOPJLB overlays XOM vs COP as total return (dividends and splits) from the first adjusted close in the selected 5Y window. Each path starts at 0% so you can read relative holding performance, not raw tape price.
Is this holding return or tape close?
Holding return. The series uses split- and dividend-adjusted close (Yahoo-style backward adjustment) when dividend coverage is sufficient, otherwise it falls back to tape close. Candles and technical overlays on /chart stay tape.
Which windows are public?
Public visitors can share 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y, and 5Y. MAX is Research+. Direction and regime in the table follow the desk ladder: SPY25 on Free, full book on Essential+.
How do I read the drawdown, period, and annual tables?
Drawdowns are current and worst peak-to-trough on the visible range. Periods are calendar lookbacks (1Y / 2Y / 3Y / 5Y, plus 10Y on MAX) from the last bar. Annual is calendar-year holding return, with the latest year labeled YTD.
How has XOM vs COP performed on a normalized basis?
XOM vs COP holding-return overlay: 5Y XOM +211.97% · COP +133.40%; worst drawdown XOM -20.51% · COP -36.29%; YTD XOM +41.87% · COP +50.34%. Numbers update from the live compare-series book.
Is ticker compare investment advice?
No. The overlay is research context only — not a recommendation to buy or sell any security.